As the qualification window for the Ryder Cup at Bethpage Black enters its final stages, a quiet but startling statistic has emerged. Of the top twelve players currently in the running for a spot on Team Europe, only one Matt Wallace at number eleven, plies his trade exclusively on the DP World Tour.

The other eleven are all full-time members of the PGA Tour.

This is not a coincidence. It is the predictable, and arguably detrimental, outcome of two powerful, interconnected forces: the DP World Tour's strategic alliance with the PGA Tour, and an Official World Golf Ranking (OWGR) system that is mathematically skewed in favour of the American circuit.

For the analytical fan, this raises a critical question: is the very structure of professional golf making it impossible for the European Tour to produce a European Ryder Cup team?

The Strategic Alliance: A Pathway or a One-Way Street?

When former DP World Tour CEO Keith Pelley orchestrated the "strategic alliance," the public-facing rationale was to create a stronger, more cohesive global game. A key component of this deal was granting the top ten players from the Race to Dubai standings full PGA Tour cards for the following season.

On the surface, this appears to be a fantastic opportunity—a clear pathway for Europe's best to compete on the world's most lucrative tour. However, the (you’d hope) unintended consequence is that the system actively strips the DP World Tour of its best assets year after year. It has effectively reframed the tour not as a destination in its own right, but as a feeder system for its American counterpart.

The result is a talent drain. The very players who should be the headline acts and seasoned veterans of the DP World Tour are, by succeeding, incentivised to leave it. This creates a perpetual state of rebuilding and diminishes the overall strength and depth of the tour.

The OWGR Problem: A System Skewed by Design

The second, more powerful force at play is the Official World Golf Ranking system itself. The OWGR is the primary currency of elite professional golf, determining entry into major championships and, crucially, Ryder Cup qualification.

The system awards points based on the "Strength of Field" (SoF) of a given tournament. Because the PGA Tour has a higher concentration of top-ranked players (many of whom are the very Europeans who earned cards via the DP World Tour), its events consistently offer significantly more ranking points than DP World Tour events.

Consider this scenario: a player finishing 10th in a standard PGA Tour event might earn more world ranking points than a player winning a regular DP World Tour event.

This creates a mathematical closed loop. To earn the points needed to qualify for the Ryder Cup, a European player almost has to play on the PGA Tour. The system is not a level playing field; it is tilted heavily in one direction. Players like Matt Wallace are not just competing against the players on the course; they are competing against a mathematical disadvantage every single week.

“However, it is still worth acknowledging that players who feel undervalued by the established system or wish to play a global schedule without a mandatory US base, the financial security and competitive fields of LIV can present a more beneficial alternative.”

The Consequence: An Identity Crisis

The Ryder Cup has always been a showcase for the strength and identity of European golf. It was a chance for players who honed their craft on the varied courses and in the challenging conditions of the DP World Tour to unite and take on the American powerhouse.

While no one would argue against having Europe's best players on the team, regardless of where they play, the current system raises an uncomfortable question. If the pathway to the team requires a player to leave their home tour, what does that say about the health and relevance of the DP World Tour itself?

This structure creates a difficult choice for top-tier European talent who may not wish to relocate their lives to the United States. The case of Adrian Meronk, who moved to LIV Golf shortly after his controversial Ryder Cup snub in 2023, is a powerful example. Many have opinions on the personality types that join LIV, with many of their most vocal (read irritating) online fans leaning into this. However, it is still worth acknowledging that players who feel undervalued by the established system or wish to play a global schedule without a mandatory US base, the financial security and competitive fields of LIV can present a more beneficial alternative.

The current standings are not an anomaly. They are a clear signal of a systemic issue. Unless the structural and mathematical biases are addressed, the sight of a European Ryder Cup team composed almost entirely of PGA Tour members will become the norm, and a vital piece of the European Tour's identity will be lost.

How I dicovered Potentially

Handicap Index® chart showing progress.

Like a lot of golfers, my relationship with the game has had its chapters. I played a lot when I was younger, then life got in the way. For ten years, my clubs gathered dust and rust.

Three years ago, I rekindled the obsession. I came back to the game and after a couple of rounds, I had a pleasant surprise: I was no worse than I was a decade earlier. A definite result! But then, a more frustrating reality set in. After two and a half years of playing regularly, I was also no better.

I was stuck. My handicap hovered stubbornly, refusing to budge. I was putting in the hours on the range, but my on-course performance felt completely disconnected from the effort. I was practising, but I wasn't improving.

That frustration sparked a question. I work in tech, and I was curious: what if modern technology could do more than just track my shots? What if it could help me understand the why behind my stagnant scores?

So, in February of this year, I started a personal project. The goal was simple: to build a tool for myself that would force me to focus on my game in a smarter way. I didn't know it then, but I was building the first version of Potentially.

“When winter subsided and I started playing outdoors again in April, my handicap was 25.8. Today, it is 18.5.”

— Adam, Potentially App Founder

That 7.3 shot drop in just a few months wasn't a miracle. It was the result of a new process. Here’s how the philosophy I built into the app changed my game, and how it has informed the platform we are now launching.

From Frustration to Focus: The Power of Reflection

The first thing I built was a guided journal. After every round, I forced myself to answer a few simple questions about my performance. What was my mindset? What was the story behind my best and worst holes? Did the round feel like the scorecard looked?

This was the first "aha!" moment. I’d walk off the course convinced my driving was the problem, but my own reflections, paired with the data, often revealed the truth was my approach play from 100-150 yards. My emotional frustration was pointing me in the wrong direction. This guided self-reflection forced me to be honest with myself and identify the real areas of potential.

From Guesswork to a Plan: The Coach

Once I had these insights, the next problem was what to do with them. This is where the Coach came in. I designed it to be the objective, unemotional strategist I didn't have.

It would analyse my stats and, crucially, the context from my reflections, and provide a clear, prioritised plan. It would say, "Forget your driver for a week. Based on your performance, the single biggest opportunity for improvement is your wedge game." This eliminated the guesswork. For the first time, I had a clear mission for my practice.

From Hitting Balls to Purposeful Practice

This is where everything came together. Armed with a clear plan, my time on the range was transformed. I stopped mindlessly hitting a hundred balls and started engaging in purposeful practice.

If the plan was to work on my wedge distance control, every ball I hit had a specific target and a clear intention. The app gave me drills designed for that exact purpose. My practice sessions were shorter, but they were a thousand times more effective because they were directly connected to the weaknesses I'd identified on the course.

This simple loop—Perform & Reflect, Practice with Purpose, Realise Your Potential—is what broke my 12-year plateau. It's the engine that has driven my own improvement, and it's the core ethos we have built into every feature of the Potentially app.

What started as a personal project to fix my own game has become a mission. I truly believe that by giving golfers the tools to understand themselves better, a better game is in everyone's potential.